LAW.coLAW.co

NICHOLAS SESSLER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM PETER, TRADING AS LUCAS PETER & SON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1916-10-03
89 N.J.L. 722

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance—.Tub Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Kalisoh, White, Terhune, Heppeniieimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 11. For reversal—if one.