HOWARD W. MILLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. I. P. THOMAS & SON COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenci-iard, Parker,o Minturn, Nalisch, Black, White, Ter-HUNE, HEPPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, TAYLOR, GARDNER, JJ. 13. For reversal—None.