LAW.coLAW.co

Lebanon Mutual Fire Ins. Co., Plff. in Err., v. Daniel Hankinson, to Use, etc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1886-04-05
2 Sadler 141

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam:

This case was submitted to the jury in a fair and correct charge. They were distinctly told if the change of the railroad track increased the danger of the building to fire so as to increase the rate of insurance, and the insured knew that fact or ought to have known it, they should find a verdict for the company. The verdict therefore establishes the fact that there was no such increased risk. We discover no error in the answers to the points.

Judgment affirmed.