Per Curiam:
These three appeals are from the same decree. They were argued together. The contention arises in the distribution of a fund produced by a sheriff’s sale of the property of Sargent & Holt, on an execution in favor of Copeland. The able report of the auditor, applying the money on that execution, was confirmed by the learned judge. It is found as a fact that there was nothing inequitable in the taking of the note on which the judgment was entered, and that there was no evidence to prove either actual or legal fraud. Such being the fact, we discover nothing in the evidence to call for a reversal of the decree.
Decree affirmed and appeal in each case dismissed, at the cost of the respective appellants therein.