LAW.coLAW.co

Thomas G. Bowlby et ux., Plffs. in Err., v. Elena M. Thunder et al.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1886-04-05
2 Sadler 191

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam:

We see no error in the admission, nor in the rejection, of evidence. The alterations in the dates were sufficiently noted on the deed to make it proper evidence; and no sufficient evidence was given or offered to change its effect. Judgment affirmed.