PER CURIAM:
Appellant Robinson was convicted by a jury of assaulting a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111. He attacks his conviction on two grounds: (1) the denial of his right to a speedy trial, and (2) the identification procedures were impermissibly suggestive. Upon examination of the record we find that neither of appellant’s grounds have merit. His conviction, therefore, is affirmed.