LAW.coLAW.co

ELIZABETH WHITTINGHAM, APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF MILLBURN ET AL., RESPONDENTS

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1916-12-05
90 N.J.L. 348

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam in Whittingham v. Township of Millburn et al., No. 125, present term of this court, ante p. 344. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Garrison, Trenci-iard, Black, White, Heppeniieimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 9.

For reversal—Parker, Bergen, JJ. 2.