LAW.coLAW.co

FERDINAND H. KOENIGSBERGER, RESPONDENT, v. KATE A. MIAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF HENRY H. HANKINS, DECEASED, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1917-06-18
90 N.J.L. 695

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons set forth inthe opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Kaltscti, White, Heppeniieiaiisr, Williams. Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11. For reversal—Hone.