LAW.coLAW.co

DANIEL H. GILBERT, RESPONDENT, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, APPELLANT

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1917-03-05
90 N.J.L. 321

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The questions raised on this appeal are determined, in effect, by the principles laid down by this court in Carr v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 88 N. J. L. 235. The judgment below will he affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenh rimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 14. For reversal—None.