LAW.coLAW.co

Margaret Henderson et al., Plffs. in Err., v. Samuel Maclay et al.; Same v. Samuel O. Himes et al.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1886-10-04
3 Sadler 40

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam :

These two cases were argued together. The main facts are common to both. The cases were tried before the judge, without a jury, under the act of April 22, 1871.

We are clearly of opinion that the learned judge gave a correct construction to the trust deed. Any other would be doing violence to the plain import of its language.

Mrs. Jane E. Henderson paid for the é acres and 109 perches of land, and owned it. The possession of her husband after her death was as tenant by the curtesy only. The possession after-w ards taken and held by Maclay saved the trust under the statute. Judgment in each case affirmed.