Per Curiam:
There is nothing in this case that requires a reversal of the court helow. The amendment was properly allowed, and under the new Constitution the plaintiff was entitled to compensation for all the damages, direct or consequential, which he suffered or might suffer in consequence of the building and operation of the defendant’s road. The judgment is affirmed.
Let a like judgment be entered in the case of the Pittsburgh Junction R. Co. v. George Smith, which was argued with the above.