LAW.coLAW.co

Appeal of John H. Goldbeck et al.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1887-01-17
4 Sadler 488

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam:

The evidence was sufficient to justify the master’s finding of facts. The learned judge concurred therein. Thus it appears that Doerr complied with the obligation he assumed, to erect a building on the lot conveyed to him. It follows that the decree was correct. Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed, at the costs of the appellants.