LAW.coLAW.co

William C. Stewart et al., Plffs. in Err., v. Charles S. Wolfe et al.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1886-11-15
4 Sadler 314

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam:

The law of this case was well stated by the court below when it said that the replevin bond given by Riddle was a substitute for the property delivered to him upon it, and that the purchaser from him acquired a good title to the property sued for in this action. The judgment is affirmed.