LAW.coLAW.co

David McClelland et Ux., Plffs. in Err., v. Joseph Patterson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1886-11-15
4 Sadler 264

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam:

An examination of the facts of this case leads us to the conclusion that they were well disposed of in the court below, and that a proper exposition of the law applicable to them is contained in the charge of the learned judge who presided over the trial. Judgment is affirmed.