LAW.coLAW.co

HARCLAY HOUSE ASSOCIATES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division2001-10-09
344 N.J. Super. 296781 A.2d 1085

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

Harelay House Associates (Harelay) appeals from the judgment of the Tax Court, affirming a real property assessment by the City of East Orange. We affirm.

Harclay’s sole argument on appeal is that its methodology in establishing “fair rental value” or “economic reni/income” is correct as a matter of law and, therefore, the Tax Court should have accepted it. The Tax Court found that Harelay failed to overcome the presumption of validity or correctness which attaches to the assessment. We agree with the Tax Court and affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Joseph Small in the opinion published at 18 N.J.Tax 564 (2000).

Affirmed.