LAW.coLAW.co

Antoine KNIGHTNOR; Demetrice Murray, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ron ANGELONE; G. Johnson; R.A. Young; Page True; Elswick; J. Armentrout; Barton; R. Austin; J. Bentley; B. Edmonds; John Doe; L. Fleming; D. Mills; R. Riter; D. Armstrong; M. Pair; Mr. Ban, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2001-09-11No. No. 01-6744
18 F. App'x 173

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

Antoine Knightnor and Demetrice Murray appeal the district court order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants in this civil action challenging Division Operating Procedure 864, a prison grooming policy. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Knightnor v. Angelone, CA-00-232-7 (W.D.Va. Apr. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.