LAW.coLAW.co

Muhammad Abd Saleem EURY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel BRAXTON, Warden, Respondent-Appellee

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2001-09-05No. No. 01-7022
18 F. App'x 79

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury appeals a magistrate judge’s order directing Eury to submit an amended petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.