LAW.coLAW.co

IN THE MATTER OF BRADLEY J. WEIL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Supreme Court of New Jersey1999-11-04
162 N.J. 45738 A.2d 1290

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

ORDER

This matter having been presented to the Court pursuant to Rule l:20-10(b) following a motion for discipline by consent of BRADLEY J. WEIL of NORTH HALEDON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1987; And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent acted unethically in two matters, Salcedo and Ferrazzano; And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct warrants a reprimand;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having reviewed the record pursuant to Rule 1:20 — 10(b)(3) and having determined that respondent’s misconduct violated RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest) and RPC 8.4 (conduct involving misrepresentation); And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s ethics infractions and having granted the motion for discipline by consent; And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record ofthe proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20 — 16(e); And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that BRADLEY J. WEIL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.