LAW.coLAW.co

Edward Czarniecki et al., Appts., v. H. L. Bollman, Jr. et al.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1887-11-11No. No. 201, W. D.
9 Sadler 32

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam:

We concur with the court below, so far as its injunction restrains the defendants from using the proposed buildings as a bone-boiling establishment, for everyone knows that carrion cannot be gathered together in any populous neighborhood without being offensive. But the erection of the buildings themselves cannot be regarded as a nuisance; and we must, therefore, direct a modification of the injunction so far as it regards such erection, and no farther.

With this modification the decree is affirmed, and the appellants are ordered to pay the costs.