LAW.coLAW.co

Charles N. Brumm et Ux., Appts., v. Pottsville Water Company et al.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1888-03-05No. No. 194, E. D.
9 Sadler 483

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam :

Having carefully examined the opinion of the learned judge of the court below, we deem it unnecessary to add anything to what he has so well said. Nothing, therefore, remains for ns but to concur in the decree which he has made. The appeal is dismissed and the decree affirmed, at the costs of appellants.

A motion for reargument was refused March 19, 1888.