PER CURIAM.
Robert A. Reed appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Reed v. Peguese, No. CA-03-726-PJM (D.Md. filed Sept. 26, 2003 & entered Sept. 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED