LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor Sidney HALUSKA, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1972-09-28No. No. 72-1658
467 F.2d 207

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM:

Three months after failure to report for induction pursuant to order of his local board, appellant submitted a claim for hardship (III-A) classification. He complains that his local board failed to reopen his classification. The local board did not act improperly. United States v. Hart, 433 F.2d 950 (9th Cir. 1970). Nor was the board required to state reasons for failing to reopen or to advise appellant that it would not reopen, or that it had received adverse information bearing upon appellant’s claims. United States v. Hart, supra.

Judgment affirmed.