LAW.coLAW.co

Edward Junior CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. QUEEN CITY RECOVERY; Carlyle Britt, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2001-10-25No. No. 01-1777
21 F. App'x 162

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward Junior Clark appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clark v. Queen City Recovery, No. CA-00-372-3MU (W.D.N.C. May 9 & 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.