LAW.coLAW.co

Tae II BONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPARTAN MARKET, INCORPORATED; Mrs. Kim, Defendants-Appellees

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit2001-11-06No. No. 01-1458
21 F. App'x 222

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tae II Bong appeals the district court’s order granting judgment for Defendants. We have reviewed the record, including the district court’s statements from the bench, and find no reversible error. The district court did not commit clear error in finding Bong failed to establish Spartan Market failed to pay him the legal minimum wage for overtime work. See Hen dricks v. Central Reserve Life Ins. Co., 39 F.3d 507, 512-13 (4th Cir.1994) (noting standard of review for factual findings). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.