LAW.coLAW.co

Shultz v. Boehme, Executor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1888-11-05No. No. 50
1 Monag. 245

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam,

The question of evidence, which we have before us in this case, was properly determined in the court below. The question was ingeniously put, but it was clearly designed to draw out the fact, by a negative answer, that the bond had come into the defendant’s possession before the death of Agatha Bentz. Such being the case, the question was not allowable. The judgment is affirmed.