LAW.coLAW.co

Scheid v. Rapp

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania1888-10-01No. No. 87
1 Monag. 430

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Sterrett, J.,

Plaintiff below agreed to erect and complete defendant’s building, according to plans and specifications, by August 1st, 1884, for $3,090, payable $300 every two weeks during the intervening five months. He also covenanted “ for himself his heirs, executors and administrators, that he will not suffer or permit to be filed . . . any mechanics’ lien or liens against the said building for the period of six months after its completion.”

The sole question is, whether the contractor, by his covenant, waived the right to file, or authorize to be filed, a lien in his own favor. We think he did. While the phraseology of the stipulation is different from that in Long v. Oaffrey, 93 Pa. 526, the legal effect of both is the same. The lien under consideration was necessarily filed by the plaintiff below himself, or by his sufferance or permission. In either case, it was as clearly a violation of his covenant as if he had suffered or permitted any mechanic or material man to file a lien.

The defendant’s point should have been affirmed and a verdict directed in his favor.

Judgment reversed.