PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this case of passing counterfeit money is affirmed.
An officer’s recounted statement of another’s passing a counterfeit bill was non-prej udicial.
And we find the testimony about a call to the sheriff’s office for a name check did not taint the record. No motions to strike were made with reference to either of the foregoing statements. There was only a motion for a mistrial. We think knowledge could be inferred from the circumstances.
Bail is revoked effective now.