PER CURIAM.
Dale Lewis Gibson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Gibson’s motion to hold this appeal in abeyance pending the district court’s action on his motion for a certificate of appealability, deny a certificate of appeal-ability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Gibson, Nos. CR-98-249-4; CA-01-77-1 (W.D.N.C. May 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.