PER CURIAM.
Ivan Julian Stevenson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Stevenson, Nos. CR-93-30025-3; CA-01-495-7 (W.D.Va. July 9, 2001; Aug. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.