PER CURIAE.
Keith Russell Judd seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his application for a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See Judd v. United States, No. CA-00-213 (S.D.W.Va. May 24, 2001). We also deny Judd’s “Emergency Motion for En Bane Rehearing of September 6, 2001 Order,” which we construe as a motion for reconsideration of that order under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 27(b). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.