PER CURIAM.
Scott Anthony Martin appeals from the district court’s order denying his request for preparation of transcripts at government expense in order to prepare a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Martin, No. CR-00-82 (E.D.Va. filed July 13, 2001; entered July 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.