PER CURIAM.
Randy Chester Parsons appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order based upon the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Parsons, No. CR-95-77-BO (E.D.N.C. May 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.