LAW.coLAW.co

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco GONZALEZ-CISNEROS, Defendant-Appellant

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2003-11-17No. No. 02-10524
81 F. App'x 673

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

MEMORANDUM

Francisco Gonzalez-Cisneros appeals his jury trial conviction and 135-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Gonzalez-Cisneros has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

Gonzalez-Cisneros has filed a pro se supplemental brief. However, our independent review of the record, pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and his pro se supplemental brief, discloses no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.