PER CURIAM.
Benjamin L. Doyle appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2), 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Doyle v. Fury, No. CA-03-139-5-F (E.D.N.C. filed July 16, 2003 & entered July 17, 2003). We deny Doyle’s motions for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED