PER CURIAM.
Freda Hogue appeals the district court’s order denying her motions for judgment as a matter of law and for a new trial following a jury verdict unfavorable to her in her employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hogue v. Sam’s Club, No. CA-99-1893-AW (D.Md. May 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.