LAW.coLAW.co

H. P. Anderson, Appellant, v. Cecil McMichael and William Snyder

Superior Court of Pennsylvania1897-12-13No. Appeal, No. 154
6 Pa. Super. 114

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam,

The question raised by the motion to quash is ruled by our decision in Yost v. Davison, 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 469, and the cases there cited, and needs no discussion. The order appealed from is neither a final judgment nor an order in the nature of a final judgment, but is interlocutory, and from it an independent appeal does not lie. The appeal is quashed at the cost of the appellant and the record remitted with a procedendo.