LAW.coLAW.co

THOMAS STOKES ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. ALBERT HARDY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1907-06-17
74 N.J.L. 851

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice. Dixon in that court, reported in 44 Vroom 255. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Seed, Trenci-iard, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 13. For reversal — Hone.