LAW.coLAW.co

SARAH BURNS AND HUSBAND, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. RICHARD ECKERT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1907-02-02
74 N.J.L. 685

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this cause is affirmed, for the reason given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court. For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Garrison, Hendrickson, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 12. For reversal — Hone.