STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID MAURE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT; STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RAYMOND HOBBS AND DANIEL HOBART, DEFENDANTS, AND HAROLD PETTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime’s opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 240 N.J.Super. 269, 573 A.2d 186 (1990). For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed — None.