LAW.coLAW.co

T. EDWARD HOLLANDER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOHN S. WATSON ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MERCER COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ARTHUR R. SYPEK, SR., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division1980-04-21
173 N.J. Super. 300

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by Judge Greenberg reported at 167 N.J.Super. 588 (1979), and on the additional areas of incompati bility of the two offices existing under various statutes, including particularly N.J.S.A. 40:41A-37(b), N.J.S.A. 40A:9-23 and N.J.S.A. 18A:64A-9, which respectively require approval by the board of freeholders of the appointment of county community college trustees and delegates to the board of freeholders the power to remove them. Atlantic Commun. College v. Civil Service Comm’n, 59 N.J. 102 (1971); Mercer Commun. College v. Sypek, 160 N.J.Super. 452 (App.Div.1978), certif. den. 78 N.J. 327 (1978). See also, for example, N.J.S.A. 18A:64A-12(j), 19, and 24.

Affirmed.