Per Curiam.
We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge William E. Wood in the Law Division. 102 N. J. Super. 497 (1968). See, also, Smith v. Morris Tp. Comm., 101 N. J. Super. 271, 280 (App. Div. 1968).
SAUL BRAZER AND GLORIA BRAZER, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE, IN THE COUNTY OF UNION, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE IN THE COUNTY OF UNION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
104 N.J. Super. 456
Authorities cited
No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.