LAW.coLAW.co

JERSEY CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND NEWPORT ASSOCIATES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR-APPELLANT, v. TUG AND BARGE URBAN RENEWAL CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY THROUGH THE TIDELANDS RESOURCE COUNCIL IN THE DIVISION OF COASTAL RESOURCES IN THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND GENERAL ELECTRIC CREDIT CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION; UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK; CITY OF JERSEY CITY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; JERSEY CITY SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; AND TUG & BARGE DRY DOCKS, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS; JERSEY CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TUG AND BARGE URBAN RENEWAL CORPORATION, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division1988-02-08
228 N.J. Super. 24

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of the Superior Court, Law Division, is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the comprehensive and well-reasoned letter opinions of Judge Humphreys dated February 16, 1987 and July 2, 1987, as supplemented by his written opinion dated January 21, 1988, reported in 228 N.J.Super. 88 (Law Div.1988). Affirmed.