LAW.coLAW.co

OTTO H. URBANECK, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1908-06-15
75 N.J.L. 938

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Reed, delivered in the court below, reported in 45 Vroom 393. For affirmance — Ti-ie Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Vroom, Green. Gray, Dill, J.J. 11. For reversal — None.