LAW.coLAW.co

THOMAS TONKS AND HARRY TONKS, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM F. MULLIN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1908-03-02
75 N.J.L. 942

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Curiam.

An examination of the record discloses no error prejudicial to the plaintiff in error. The judgment under review should be affirmed. For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Bogert, Yroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 12. For reversal — None.