LAW.coLAW.co

Lillian Ruth Arthur, respondent, v. Clarence J. Arthur, appellant

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1925-05-18
98 N.J. Eq. 393

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for-the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Advisory Master Grey. For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, KatzenbAoh, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Busicirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 14. For reversal — None.