LAW.coLAW.co

Saltar against Administrator of Saltar

New Jersey Supreme Court1797-09
6 N.J.L. 493

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the application right, and that it ought to be granted.

Motion granted.

Note. — In Massachusetts it has been held, in a case of this kind, that a special count laying a promise to an administrator is unnecessary, (Baxter v. Penniman, 8 Mass. 133) though it is required in the English practice. Dean v. Crane, 1 Salk. 28.