LAW.coLAW.co

The State against Fisler

New Jersey Supreme Court1796-04
6 N.J.L. 371

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The answers must be made ore tenus.

The defendant being then called up and sworn, the interrogatories were severally proposed to him, and he answered them from a printed paper, which he held in his hand, containing answers to each of the interrogatories; after-wards he signed the printed answers, and they were annexed to the interrogatory. The counsel had the, answers printed, because the defendant was incapable of reading manuscript, ut audivi.