LAW.coLAW.co

THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM CONKLIN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1910-01-07
78 N.J.L. 743

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, with costs, there being no error disclosed in the record or proceedings. Por affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 14. Por reversal — None.