THE STATE, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. GEORGE VEZ, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

Per Curiam.

No merit being found in any of the grounds urged for reversal, the j udgment under review herein should be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon, JJ. 15. For reversal — None.