LAW.coLAW.co

WILLIAM MILLS ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. JOHN BAIZLEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

New Jersey Court of Errors and Appeals1895-03
57 N.J.L. 711

Authorities cited

No cited authorities resolved to law.co cases yet.

Opinion

majority opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court. For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Gummere, Magie, Réed, Yan Syckel, Sims; 6. For reversal — Dixon, Lippincott, Bogert, Brown. 4.